tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4159906646513306121.post4248273183236440616..comments2023-11-19T20:38:50.237-08:00Comments on Economic Logic: Insure better against natural disastersEconomic Logicianhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10171296292101248614noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4159906646513306121.post-47021358830320874762013-01-18T10:32:37.997-08:002013-01-18T10:32:37.997-08:00I agree that insurance that is heavily subsidized ...I agree that insurance that is heavily subsidized like the one you describe is wrong. You do not want insurance to encourage dangerous behavior too much).Economic Logicianhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10171296292101248614noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4159906646513306121.post-61413303513760089492013-01-18T10:01:15.995-08:002013-01-18T10:01:15.995-08:00What do you think about doing away with government...What do you think about doing away with government subsidies for insurance premiums on homes in flood prone areas? While this could be a good way to disincentivize home purchases in disaster prone areas, it might--in many cases--broach the question of economic inequality.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08473569285990076099noreply@blogger.com