Posts
It is a recognized problem that demographic change is bringing significant problems to pensions systems. People live longer and thus spend a larger share of their life on a pension, which costs a lot (see Greece for a spectacular example). And fewer births per capita imply that fewer working people can support the pensioners. The solutions are thus: lower benefits, increase contributions, raise retirement age, encourage fertility (and increase mortality, but that is politically not feasible).
Alessandro Cigno suggests a clever way to improve the situation that is equivalent to a combination of the above policy changes: make part of the pension benefits contingent upon having children. Clearly, this should increase fertility. However, this is a step back to the time where one would rely on one's own children for old age. Also, I am not sure the fertility incentive is ell timed. Young households are discounting heavily retirement when they make fertility choices, and contemporaneous incentives should have much more bite than some that kick in only decades later.
Wednesday, May 12, 2010
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
4 comments:
It is really very useful article and people can know about it. I like to read this article very much and also hope that some other people can know about it.
But isn't the reason why we moved to "forced savings" schemes like Social Security was because the government cannot credibly commit not to support you in your old age?
I thought that was rather because social security is an insurance scheme that allows people without adult children, or an insufficient number of them, to still get old-age support. And like unemployment insurance, it can only work if the government makes it mandatory. Thus, I do not view that as a lack of commitment of the government, rather as the government forcing an insurance scheme on us for the common good.
The government should only get into providing social security if there is a market failure. Where is the failure in the self-insurance market? A lack of redistribution?
Post a Comment